🔗 Share this article

Each time a significant prize-giving event draws close, one notices an outcry for introducing fresh award types to honor unsung work and delight the spirits of fans dedicated to specific genres.

My colleague previously argued advocating for terror-themed awards. That would be fantastic. Equally deserving are strategy board titles, representing a dedicated supporter's campaign. Yet I need to apologize in advance if I try to elbow in front because like all dedicated enthusiasts, I have a cast-iron argument backing this proposal remains most pressing above others. The demand is this: There should be an award type for logic-based games.

The Genre Classification Challenge

Classifying creative works defies precise measurement; it’s very subjective, and typically generate discussions resulting in unclear classifications. This explains why movie academies avoid this approach. But it is a necessary evil for the industry of interactive entertainment, which are so diverse it's challenging to consider them a single creative category.

To recognize the complete range of gaming accomplishments to receive acknowledgment, and to ensure all game types to have a chance for representation, genre categories are essential.

Current Gaming Award Categories

Leading game ceremonies offer these genre categories for Action, Action/Adventure, Role-Playing, Combat games, Simulation and strategy titles, plus athletic and racing experiences. Collectively, these six categories effectively encompass many game types, making space possible accommodating various experiences.

Not so for brain-teasing titles. There’s simply nowhere to put them. Think about these this year’s best games, each quite distinct: building puzzles of one title, intense tile-matching in a different title, engaging interpersonal challenges of a third title. Which classification works within current classifications? Nowhere, that’s where.

The Representation Problem

Numerous examples exist of brilliant puzzle games published annually lacking appropriate categories during gaming ceremonies, except when they manage to fit classification types such as Handheld titles, Virtual reality experiences, and the highly challenging small studio competitions.

• An iconic brain-teaser got overlooked for anything in 2014
• A different innovative game received no nominations during that ceremony
• Popular arranging title was overlooked in 2021
• Just some puzzle games managed to sneak into independent or mobile categories

Significance of Puzzle Games

These are often compact experiences, however the design in brain-teasers is of massive significance. Iconic mobile puzzle games rank among the most-played games worldwide continuing this trend for many years.

The legendary block-stacking game challenges famous sandbox experiences claiming status as highest-selling title ever; it also contends for top gaming experience. Brain-teasers form essential building blocks for gaming as medium, and they are in conversation across multiple categories.

The Solution and Justification

Puzzle games wouldn’t have that issue. One could readily select multiple candidates interesting, varied, worthy titles each ceremony simply — perhaps, with difficulty, since numerous excellent so many good games out.

Restating the point, these include experiences without proper classification in important events. Logic title developers function at the hard edge interactive creation, creating some of essential manifestations of the video game form. Just like cinema stunt performers, they merit acknowledgment. Let’s not keep them waiting 35 years.